Projects Missing Indigenous Peoples (PS7) Analysis

The database assembled by NomoGaia analyzing public data regarding IFC’s potential impact on indigenous peoples is available on this page, both as a downloadable file and through the search function below.

Search
Project NameProject NumberCountryCategoryNature of Indigenous Risk
Telecom Personal Argentina 36171 Argentina B IFC determines that "no Indigenous Peoples are expected to be affected" without articulating whether networks will cross indigenous lands or exclude IPs
CalidraArgentina 38366 Mexico B Argentina and Chile have IPs that merit consideration for greenfield construction of calcium carbonate mining/processing. The PS evaluation describes nursing homes
HFE Equity 37910 India A New footprint is not defined but existing footprint confirms that "tribal households" on government lands pre-dated the Dar MP project and lack traditional title
PT Aneka Gas Industri Tbk 38908 Indonesia B Indonesia has vast indigenous populations unrecognized by the state and IFC produced no evidence that "no indigenous peoples are present
Windiga BF 36857 Burkina Faso B IFC does not say how it or the client evaluated indigeneity among Burkina's ethnically - religiously and linguistically diverse population - which includes historically marginalized pastoralists
Segou Solaire 35853 Mali B Herding routes could be affected and were not apparently considered by IFC: "The project is to be constructed in modified habitat with . . . no Indigenous Peoples
Guangxi Yangxiang Co Ltd 38720 China B This is an autonomous region - land is being leased from government not communities - no articulation of how 'no IPs' was concluded
Los Grobo Equity 38193 Argentina B GLG conducts E&S screening of properties" to avoid protected areas and indigenous lands. This is a legal process that does not cover unregistered/unprotected IPs
Chint New Energy 38815 China B Chint's projects in Turkey are expected to screen for all PS risks as footprints are identified - but the ESAP cuts mention of IPs and the client has no history of doing IP reviews
Xenel Wind Jordan 35348 Jordan A In Tafilah rural herders still have strong clan and kinship ties linked to resources. But IFC bypassed PS7 because no IPs "have been identified in the project area.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *