Projects Missing Indigenous Peoples (PS7) Analysis

The database assembled by NomoGaia analyzing public data regarding IFC’s potential impact on indigenous peoples is available on this page, both as a downloadable file and through the search function below.

Search
Project NameProject NumberCountryCategoryNature of Indigenous Risk
Azure Karnataka 36716 India B Greenfield projects should consider SC/ST - no location is listed in the ESRS. There are 49 distinct SCs and STs (not including the sub-tribes of the Bhil) in Karnataka
Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Seva) Limited 36727 India B Sites will be greenfield in urban and rural settings across India but no indigenous review was conducted
Vegpro Ghana 30611 Ghana B 50-year agricultural land leases in Ghana are large enough to potentially affect traditional farming and herding
Finsch 31741 South Africa B The Khoekhoe consist of the Nama who reside mainly in the North Cape. They were not assessed for presence or impacts
Grameen Phone V 30603 Bangladesh B Across Bangladesh" theoretically includes indigenous lands e.g. Chittagong Hill Tribes
Sea Dragon 31614 Egypt A Onshore oil and gas exploration's large footprint should consider potential overlap with nomadic IPs
Hospitaria 30281 Mexico B There are indigenous peoples in this area. IFC did not locate them: "No Indigenous People are impacted by the location of the proposed project
Power Grid 31419 India A The 2014 investment (No. 34442) acknowledges affected IPS but not this one. In 2019 the Indian SC/ST Council confirmed the project alienated rights https://ncst.nic.in/sites/default/files/hearings_proceedings/2592.pdf
Russian Towers 31683 Russian Federation B Rural/frontier Russia has IPs, but these communities were not considered
SIPRA CI 31422 Cote D'Ivoire B Operations are across greater Abidjan including in rural Bingerville. Consideration of indigeneity would be appropriate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *