The database assembled by NomoGaia analyzing public data regarding IFC’s potential impact on indigenous peoples is available on this page, both as a downloadable file and through the search function below.
Project Name | Project Number | Country | Category | Nature of Indigenous Risk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indo Nepal Power | 31337 | India | B | A transmission line through Bihar is likely to impact SC and ST |
PT Panca Amara Utama | 32198 | Indonesia | A | If pipeline may cross IP lands - PS7 should be considered |
Ingenio Montelimar | 32253 | Nicaragua | A | Many agricultural workers are indigenous from the hills - though sugar operations are in lowlands. PS7 - but not FPIC - is possible but not reviewed |
SolTuna Expansion | 32053 | Solomon Islands | A | The population of the Solomon Islands is indigenous |
Protelindo | 32367 | Indonesia | B | Tower locations on islands with IPs present should consider PS7 |
ACME Energy | 32497 | India | B | Odisha and Andra Pradesh (and MP) have large SC/ST indigenous populations but project documents make no mention of them |
Olam Corp Loan | 31566 | World Region | B | Olam operations are in numerous countries with known impacts on indigenous peoples - which are not reported in IFC DD (see paper) |
Kaiima | 32746 | Israel | B | It would be important to know where in Israel - Kazakhstan and elsewhere Kaiima crops are marketed |
Masan Consumer | 32470 | Vietnam | B | Unknown footprint for expanded operations |
Parag Dairy | 33134 | India | B | Unclear if Manchar and Palamner developments are greenfield. |